Comments on: TBL Australia 4×34: The Great Poker Temptation

By: Donna

Donna — Thu, 12 Mar 2009 10:58:17 +0000

There was a pile of red shirts and a pile of blue shirts next to AJ at the end…so I'm thinking it's definately individuals. Will they split the couples?

By: Wehmer

Wehmer — Thu, 12 Mar 2009 09:33:48 +0000

In the video diaries, the rest of the people frequently comment on how the brothers get the best out of them, and how they're always keen to train with anyone once the cameras are off.

They can't be pure evil, can they? But Nathan stealing immunity off Andrew was a douchey move.

By: Pauline

Pauline — Thu, 12 Mar 2009 08:34:04 +0000

If he wasn't so bloody gung ho about it all though. People's dislike of him started with the Alpha Male crap. If you are the alpha male you don't need to tell everybody….they should know….which in this case they didn't, therefore his need to keep reminding them. Hey Wehmer where are you?

By: Mythor

Mythor — Thu, 12 Mar 2009 08:00:15 +0000

Yes, I think it may depend on who he's up against, should it ever come to that. By splitting the boys between the teams though he may not ever have to worry about personally voting Andrew out.
I think if it came down to, say, Andrew vs Amanda? Or Sharif? Or Bob? Andrew would probably get to stay. Andrew versus Cameron? Andrew may be in trouble.

I'm not sure Nathan's a bad guy as such, I think he's still too much of a control freak. Which he kind of has to be if he wants to stay in the game. So he's damned if he does and damned if he doesn't, basically!

By: Amy

Amy — Thu, 12 Mar 2009 07:27:06 +0000

I'm always fired up about something ;)

I reckon Nathan wouldn't think twice about eliminating Andrew if/when he feels he's a threat. I know the editing monkeys have decided that he's going to be portrayed as the season's villain, but I still reckon he's an awful person.

By: vivi63

vivi63 — Thu, 12 Mar 2009 05:43:50 +0000

I agree, I would have gone up to 500 cal no worries and then done extra exercise, ridiculous to let them have it so cheap, then Amanda has a whinge, she should have done it, or not whinge that no-one else did. Took me a while to get the Netball thing!
They could have easily gone up the bidding in small stages. This 'bluffing' was a joke though. What bluffing? Either you bid or you don't.

By: Pauline

Pauline — Thu, 12 Mar 2009 05:20:45 +0000

Amy are you a bit upset. I'm so over the boys. How funny would it be if Andrew fell below the yellow line that now Nathan has immunity. Wonder if he would be feeling sorry then for upping the ante. Doubt it. Nathan is all about Nathan and god help anyone who gets in the way….even Andrew.

By: Amy

Amy — Thu, 12 Mar 2009 04:00:34 +0000

OMFG!!!!! I can't believe no one played!!!!! How could they let him have it for 124 fucking calories?!?!? I was screaming at the tv. I'm getting all worked up again thinking about it! haha
He drank a 3000 calorie milkshake last week, they could have gone nuts on betting and STILL not had to eat anything! MORONS!

I so knew he'd need to get it over Andrew too. "Good boy"? Fuck off, you patronising Canberra University Netball Team!

Luckily they balanced it out with the lovely of Bob's reward. I love Bob!

By: Donna

Donna — Thu, 12 Mar 2009 03:58:17 +0000

There was a pile of red shirts and a pile of blue shirts next to AJ at the end…so I'm thinking it's definately individuals. Will they split the couples?

By: Wehmer

Wehmer — Thu, 12 Mar 2009 02:33:48 +0000

In the video diaries, the rest of the people frequently comment on how the brothers get the best out of them, and how they're always keen to train with anyone once the cameras are off.

They can't be pure evil, can they? But Nathan stealing immunity off Andrew was a douchey move.

By: Pauline

Pauline — Thu, 12 Mar 2009 01:34:04 +0000

By: Mythor

Mythor — Thu, 12 Mar 2009 01:00:15 +0000

By: Amy

Amy — Thu, 12 Mar 2009 00:27:06 +0000

I'm always fired up about something ;)

By: vivi63

vivi63 — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 22:43:50 +0000

By: Pauline

Pauline — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 22:20:45 +0000