but i still don’t think it’s unfair. i find kimberlie’s defense compelling, from tv week: “there’s a word that gets thrown around a lot in that house and it’s ‘deserve’. everyone thinks they ‘deserve’ something more than everyone else, when in the end it’s luck. we were all lucky to be picked out of 10,000 people. no one ‘deserves’ something more than someone else because they’ve spend an extra week living in a mansion”.

which of the final six can honestly say that they would not have taken the opportunity to be outsiders, had they missed out on a spot in the house? certainly not the same ones who complain the most, i bet.

Do you honestly think it’s fair to introduce new people this late in the game?

It’s a legitimate complaint about the manner in which the game is being run this year.
If you think this shit is fine, good for you. Keep referring to it as “sooking” though and your comments are going walkies.

i guess if the outsiders stay above the yellow line, then their immunity won’t make any difference. and they can lose their immunity anyway, if they come last in the challenge, maybe if some little thing goes wrong for them. so all hope is not lost for all you sooks out there, and in there.

i was away from the tv during the two weeks that kelly and michael got evicted. from what i’ve read, it sounded like kelly sort of deserved it, but it sounded like michael was just tarred with the same brush.

It’s definitely not the most unfair thing that’s happened, since the introduction of the Outsiders was more unfair than them being given immunity, but basically the whole thing pretty much stinks.

Michael and Kelly’s evictions weren’t unfair – they were trying to play the game to their own ends and their teammates didn’t like it. No one but themselves to blame for it!
P’eta’s elimination was indeed very unfair, but none of it means that the introduction of the Outsiders is somehow okay because there’s been worse things inflicted on them. That’s like having someone rock up one day and shoot one of the Fatties dead, then expecting everyone to be happy when the day after they only have someone come around and chop all their right hands off. It might be a lesser offense, but it still ain’t right!

since they have been brought in, i think it’s only fair that they get immunity for one week, since it’s otherwise a foregone conclusion that they’ll be going home if they fall below the yellow line.

they’re big enough sooks in the house, without everyone here sooking as well.

giving the outsiders immunity is far from the most unfair thing that’s happened. the original contestants themselves have inflicted the most unfair eliminations: alex, marty, maybe michael and maybe kelly – and let’s not forget pieta, although her elimination was a big brother style twist, so not really the contestants’ fault.