but i still don’t think it’s unfair. i find kimberlie’s defense compelling, from tv week: “there’s a word that gets thrown around a lot in that house and it’s ‘deserve’. everyone thinks they ‘deserve’ something more than everyone else, when in the end it’s luck. we were all lucky to be picked out of 10,000 people. no one ‘deserves’ something more than someone else because they’ve spend an extra week living in a mansion”.

which of the final six can honestly say that they would not have taken the opportunity to be outsiders, had they missed out on a spot in the house? certainly not the same ones who complain the most, i bet.

Do you honestly think it’s fair to introduce new people this late in the game?

It’s a legitimate complaint about the manner in which the game is being run this year.
If you think this shit is fine, good for you. Keep referring to it as “sooking” though and your comments are going walkies.

i guess if the outsiders stay above the yellow line, then their immunity won’t make any difference. and they can lose their immunity anyway, if they come last in the challenge, maybe if some little thing goes wrong for them. so all hope is not lost for all you sooks out there, and in there.

i was away from the tv during the two weeks that kelly and michael got evicted. from what i’ve read, it sounded like kelly sort of deserved it, but it sounded like michael was just tarred with the same brush.

It’s definitely not the most unfair thing that’s happened, since the introduction of the Outsiders was more unfair than them being given immunity, but basically the whole thing pretty much stinks.

Michael and Kelly’s evictions weren’t unfair – they were trying to play the game to their own ends and their teammates didn’t like it. No one but themselves to blame for it!
P’eta’s elimination was indeed very unfair, but none of it means that the introduction of the Outsiders is somehow okay because there’s been worse things inflicted on them. That’s like having someone rock up one day and shoot one of the Fatties dead, then expecting everyone to be happy when the day after they only have someone come around and chop all their right hands off. It might be a lesser offense, but it still ain’t right!

since they have been brought in, i think it’s only fair that they get immunity for one week, since it’s otherwise a foregone conclusion that they’ll be going home if they fall below the yellow line.

they’re big enough sooks in the house, without everyone here sooking as well.

giving the outsiders immunity is far from the most unfair thing that’s happened. the original contestants themselves have inflicted the most unfair eliminations: alex, marty, maybe michael and maybe kelly – and let’s not forget pieta, although her elimination was a big brother style twist, so not really the contestants’ fault.

At least with the eliminated people it was a competition between them though. This is just two people being injected without ever having to face off against anyone. It’s not right.
I think they’re trying to inject some BB-type elements to try and lift the ratings, rather than trying to improve the quality of the show by, say, not having 5 in 20 minutes be repeats of earlier events… :-\

I hope the newbies lose their immunity on the walk, I really do. It’s so shit for the others. I’ve heard so many rumours that Munnalita is in the top 4, it makes me wonder which of the good ones will get kicked out instead :(

Okay, this is just shit. Outsiders? WTF? It was bad enough last year when the eliminated people got a chance to get back in. This just sucks. I hope they lose their immunity. Not because I want them gone, but it just isn’t fair.

Do the producers think TBL is BB? I don’t get it. Yeah, screw with their heads that is all part of the game. Fairness should be there too, and quite frankly, this isn’t fair.

I like Kimberlie’s smile though. It is a genuine, from-the-soul smile.